The Federal Highway Act of 1956 free essay sample

This paper examines the job that the Federal Highway Act of 1956 played in assisting with figuring out what shape America would assume control in the course of the last 50% of the twentieth century. This paper inspects the biggest open works task of now is the ideal time, the Federal Highway Act of 1956. The paper takes a gander at the chronicled occasions that hinted at President Eisenhowers marking of the Act. It at that point proceeds to examine the positive effect that it would have on the U.S. economy, taking a gander at such themes as business, land advancement, travel, retail rivalry and lower purchaser costs and cargo costs. The paper at that point analyzes the negative effect the Act would have on the economy taking a gander at such zones as mass travel, mass relocation, travel and air contamination. The last are that the paper manages is the social effect. The creator feels that dependent on their investigation of the Act, it had an on a very basic level positive effect in forming America in the course of recent years. We will compose a custom exposition test on The Federal Highway Act of 1956 or then again any comparative subject explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page The development of this framework has given Americans access to significant land, which energized development and improvement of land including private, mechanical and business. Private properties made because of the interstate framework frequently comes as single-family homes. Everywhere throughout the nation neighborhoods run nearby interstate expressways. The framework has made an assortment of business advancement including side of the road organizations, for example, lodgings and eateries. The interstate framework additionally supported in the improvement of mechanical properties including atomic force plants.

Benedict Arnold Essay -- essays research papers fc

Benedict Arnold was conceived in Norwich, Connecticut. Arnold got his tutoring at Canterbury. While away at school, a couple of Arnold’s kin died from Yellow Fever. Arnold was an irksome child that would attempt pretty much anything. As a 14-year-old kid, he fled from home to battle in the French and Indian War. Afterward, Benedict Arnold left and got back through the wild alone to work with his cousins. The military had pardoned him without punishment as a result of his young age. In 1762, when Benedict was only twenty-one years of age, he went to New Haven, Connecticut where he dealt with a book and medication store and continued exchange with the West Indies. (B Arnold) In 1767, he wedded Margaret Mansfield, a little girl of a sheriff of New Haven County. They had three children together. At the point when the Revolutionary War was simply starting to break out, Benedict Arnold turned into a prosperous boat proprietor, dealer, and merchant. Inside days, Arnold turned out to be keen on the war indeed and joined the American Army. The entirety of the fights Arnold told over indicated enormous mental fortitude and grit, yet he was before long known as America’s most prominent backstabber because of his selling out of the American’s. As the Revolutionary War broke out, Benedict Arnold chose to elect to head more than 1,000 men up to Maine. He requested extra men from his organizations to join the military. Arnold at that point turned into a chief in the Connecticut Militia. General George Washington had his top choices, which Arnold was among the not many. Along these lines, Benedict Arnold was sent on a fiendish 500 mile walk to Maine by Washington, otherwise called "The Rock". (Macks 72) Benedict Arnold and just around 50% of his unique troopers made it to the St. Lawrence River where they got together with General Montgomery. Their arrangement was to assault the British Army off guard Quebec City, Canada. Both Montgomery and Arnold orchestrated to begin the grand mountainsides of Quebec. Arnold and his fighters ended up caught by the British. An individual from the British Army shot a black powder rifle ball legitimately towards Arnold’s leg. His leg was seriously broken and he must be taken to a medical clinic bed just about a mile away from the assault. The assault had kept going fifty days and the mystery venture brought about a fiasco for the volunteer officers who walked away. The conditions were awful. It was said that very nearly 50% of the men solidified, starved... ... what's more, the other three were from his first union with Margaret. His four children at that point became individuals from the British military. America presently has their first awful backstabber! Reference index Works Cited Benedict Arnold on Lake Champlain. The Battle of Valcour Island. On the web. Web. 7 March 2000. Accessible: http://www.heroswelcome.com/Arnold.htm Connecticut SAR. The Connecticut Society of the Sons of the American Revolution. On the web. Web. 28 Feb. 2000. Accessible: http://www.ctssar.org/ Flynn, J. Michael. Benedict Arnold: The Traitor Who Saved America. On the web. Web. 18 March 2000. Accessible: http://www.magweb.com/test/scry/sch23ben.htm Memorable Valley Forge. Benedict Arnold. On the web. Web. 19 March 2000. Accessible: http://www.ushistory.org/valleyforge/served/arnold.html Kenneth, Dave C. "Say You Want a Revolution." Don’t Know Much About History. U.S.A: Avon Books, 1995. Freedom. Account of the Revolution. Benedict Arnold’s Leg. On the web. Web. 7 March 2000. Accessible: http://www.pbs.org/ktca/freedom/narrative/ben.arnold.leg.html Mack, Stan. "Redcoats and Guerrillas." Real Life American Revolution. USA: Avon Books, 1994.

Jonathan Edwards and the Puritan Mind Essay example -- essays papers

Jonathan Edwards and the Puritan Mind If one somehow managed to examine the possibility of Puritan thoroughly considered just the perusing of these three works of Jonathan Edwards, one could most likely accumulate a smart thought of the inward activities of the Puritan mind. These three works do well to uncover to the peruser the inward and external operations of Jonathan Edwards. The Personal Narrative presentations to the peruser Jonathan Edwards' perspective on himself as he advanced through life, and the goals and the things that were generally significant to him, and the things that were a block to himself. The lesson A Divine and Supernatural Light displays the idea of Jonathan Edwards' scholarly psyche, and the perspective on descriptive lecturing that he and the Puritan brain may have held and embraced. At last, Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God shows Jonathan Edwards' energy for individuals to go to a similar comprehension of God as he (and most different Puritans) held. Through these three abstract pieces we will perceive how the Puritan mind battles with the objectives of internal and external devotion, and how they worry about the unceasing situation of their spirit. Jonathan Edwards, as a model of Puritan life, carried on with a real existence that concerned itself significantly with showing up and feeling genuine. The vast majority of the Personal Narrative shows Edwards in a battle between getting a kick out of God, and returning like a pooch to his regurgitation, (176) and going the method for wrongdoing. It appears, however, as Edwards developed in his confidence, his anxiety for devotion became considerably further. At a few focuses in his life he chose to part with everything on the planet for an enthusiasm for Christ (177). Edwards battled to charm himself in the things of God and encircle himself with those things, regularly closing different things out all together that he mama... ... salvation as some liberal scholars would recommend to us. Taking everything into account, Edwards illustrates how a Puritan mind functions through these three papers/messages in this book. Puritan thought is viewed as devout, intelligent, otherworldly, works-based, worried about their salvation, and select in nature. Edwards offers a three-dimensional perspective on how his psyche functions through the story of his own life (Personal Narrative), crafted by his scholarly brain (A Divine and Supernatural Light), and the enthusiasm of his spirit (Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God). Being an understudy of religious philosophy, I thought that it was an intriguing understanding into how his psyche functioned, in observing Edwards' perspective on God. I am a firm devotee to getting individuals and their inspiration by taking a gander at their comprehension of God. Edwards was a superb case of the Puritan mind.

New SAT Math How to Solve Linear Equations

Knowing how to solve linear equations is key for success on the SAT Math section. Linear equations are equations that consist of variables raised to the power of 1. When graphed, these equations produce a straight line. Solving Linear Equations With One Variable These are simple to solve once you get the hang of it. 1. For linear equations that consist of only one variable, the key is to isolate the variable on one side. 2. Next, get all the constants to the other side of the equation. 3. Lastly, simplify both sides of the equation until you get to the answer. New SAT Math: Linear Equation Example Lets take a look at a common question type that the new SAT test makers will throw at you. If 6x = 42 and xk = 2, what is the value of k?†¨ A. 2/7 B. 1/6 C. 7 D. 1/7 Lets take a look at both equations and think about it for a second. In the first equation, there is only one variable, and it is raised to the power of 1. Since there is more than one variable in the second equation (x and k), we cant know for sure what k is unless we solve for x first. We should go ahead and solve the first equation for x before moving on to the next equation. 1. In order to isolate the variable on one side, we need to divide both sides by 6. That yields x = 7. 2. Now we can plug in x = 7 into the second equation. This gives us 7k = 2. 3. In order to isolate the k on one side, divide both sides by 7. This leaves us with k = 2/7. In this case, the answer is A. New SAT Math: Linear Equation Example #2 James is budgeting his time to think about the number of classes c he will take this year. For every class that he takes, he believes that hell spend 2 1/2 hours each week working on homework. He believes that hell spend an additional 6 1/2 hours each week completing the reading work for all of his classes together. If James has 19 hours free every week to finish homework and reading work for his classes, which equation best models this situation? A. 2.5c – 6.5 = 19 B. 2.5c + 6.5 = 19 C. 6.5c – 2.5 = 19 D. 6.5c + 2.5 = 19 This type of question looks much more involved than the first one, but dont worry! The key here is to circle keywords so that we can construct an equation quickly and move on to the next question without getting bogged down too much from all the reading we have to do. 1. Circle all the keywords – the variables involved and the numbers that we have to work with. In this case, we have 2.5 hours per class per week, 6.5 hours for reading work per week, and 19 hours of free time. 2. Look at what the question is asking for. Here we want to figure out how many classes James can take in a week given his time constraint (19 hours per week). 3. Put the numbers together and create the equation. We dont know how many classes James is going to take each week, so we should put a variable after 2.5 to indicate the unknown number. In this case, c = the number of classes. 2.5c Since James believes that he will spend 6.5 hours total each week for reading work regardless of the number of classes taken, we should add that to 2.5x to represent the total number of hours spent on homework and reading work. 2.5c + 6.5 James has 19 hours total to complete all of his work, so lets set 2.5x + 6.5 equal to 19 to figure out the maximum number of classes he can take. 2.5c + 6.5 = 19 Choice B matches our answer! A job well done.

Empirical Formula Definition and Examples

The empirical formula of a compound is defined as the  formula that shows the ratio of elements present in the compound, but not the actual numbers of atoms found in the molecule. The ratios are denoted by subscripts next to the element symbols. Also Known As: The empirical formula is also known as the  simplest formula  because the subscripts are the smallest whole numbers that indicate the ratio of elements. Empirical Formula Examples Glucose has a molecular formula of C6H12O6. It contains 2 moles of hydrogen for every mole of carbon and oxygen. The empirical formula for glucose is CH2O. The molecular formula of ribose is C5H10O5, which can be reduced to the empirical formula CH2O. How to Determine Empirical Formula Begin with the number of grams of each element, which you usually find in an experiment or have given in a problem.To make the calculation easier, assume the total mass of a sample is 100 grams, so you can work with simple percentages. In other words, set the mass of each element equal to the percent. The total should be 100 percent.Use the molar mass you get by adding up the atomic weight of the elements from the periodic table to convert the mass of each element into moles.Divide each mole value by the small number of moles you obtained from your calculation.Round each number you get to the nearest whole number. The whole numbers are the mole ratio of elements in the compound, which are the subscript numbers that follow the element symbol in the chemical formula. Sometimes determining the whole number ratio is tricky and youll need to use trial and error to get the correct value. For values close to x.5, youll multiply each value by the same factor to obtain the smallest whole number multiple. For example, if you get 1.5 for a solution, multiply each number in the problem by 2 to make the 1.5 into 3. If you get a value of 1.25, multiply each value by 4 to turn the 1.25 into 5. Using Empirical Formula to Find Molecular Formula You can use the empirical formula to find the molecular formula if you know the molar mass of the compound. To do this, calculate the empirical formula mass and then divide the compound molar mass by the empirical formula mass. This gives you the ratio between the molecular and empirical formulas. Multiply all of the subscripts in the empirical formula by this ratio to get the subscripts for the molecular formula. Empirical Formula Example Calculation A compound is analyzed and calculated to consist of 13.5 g Ca, 10.8 g O, and 0.675 g H. Find the empirical formula of the compound. Start by converting the mass of each element into moles by looking up the atomic numbers from the periodic table. The atomic masses of the elements are 40.1 g/mol for Ca, 16.0 g/mol for O, and 1.01 g/mol for H. 13.5 g Ca x (1 mol Ca / 40.1 g Ca) 0.337 mol Ca 10.8 g O x (1 mol O / 16.0 g O) 0.675 mol O 0.675 g H x (1 mol H / 1.01 g H) 0.668 mol H Next, divide each mole amount by the smallest number or moles (which is 0.337 for calcium) and round to the nearest whole number: 0.337 mol Ca / 0.337   1.00 mol Ca 0.675 mol O / 0.337 2.00 mol O 0.668 mol H / 0.337 1.98 mol H which rounds up to 2.00 Now you have the subscripts for the atoms in the empirical formula: CaO2H2 Finally, apply the rules of writing formulas to present the formula correctly. The cation of the compound is written first, followed by the anion. The empirical formula is properly written as Ca(OH)2

The Background on the Stanley Milgram Theory Essay

The social psychology theory that I will be analyzing is based on the Stanley Milgram experiment done in 1965 following the start of the Nazi war. He was curios on all the violence taking place during this time. As a Jew himself, he wanted to find out whether or not the Adolf Eichmann accomplice had the same intent and hate towards the Jewish people during the holocaust. Based on Solomon Asch’s past experiments on conformity, Milgram’s experiment was done to determine whether or not the power of the situation could cause average people to conform to obedience. The results of Milgram’s experiment were astounding. The research of Milgram’s experiment had such a major impact on social psychology that we still use his findings to analyze†¦show more content†¦It is not until then that some of the participants began to question what they were doing. The experimenter would simply tell the participants to â€Å"continue.† A few of them requested to stop, but still continued to issue the shocks after being prompted that they will not be held responsible. The results showed that 65% of the â€Å"teachers† punished the â€Å"learners† to the maximum voltage of 450 volts. The research also showed that none of the subjects stopped before reaching 300 volts. Different factors contributed to the amount of people who issued the maximum voltage. Things like the location dropped the percentage who issued the 300 volts. For instance, when they decided to conduct the experiment in an office building rather than in on campus at Yale, the percentage of those who issued the maximum voltage dropped almost 20%. These findings were stunning to those involved in the experiment. Nobody predicted these results prior to the research being done. In fact Milgram believed he most people wouldn’t go past 150 volts. He predicted that only 4% of participants would go past 150 volts of punishment. (Milgram, 1974) The results later led to Milgram’s theory of obedience. It is ironic that virtues of loyalty, discipline, and self-sacrifice that we value so highly in the individual are the very properties that create destructive organizational engines of war and bind men to malevolent systems of authority. (Milgram, 1974) Impact of Milgram’s Theory SomeShow MoreRelatedMilgram Experiment : What Was The Intent?1571 Words   |  7 Pagesdid Hitler condemn so many people to death and question why he was hated by them?† Well that is exactly why Stanley Milgram conducted experiments to test how far an ordinary person would inflict pain onto a stranger. The Nazi killing was brutal and inhumane but the people conflicting death upon thousands felt no remorse or guilt so the Milgram Experiment was used to finally get answers. Milgram concluded that many will go to extreme lengths to obey authority and tend to believe what they are doing isRead MoreMilgram Experiment : What Was The Intent?1573 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"Why did the subordinates of Adolph Hitler blindly follow his immoral orders?† Well, that is exactly why Stanley Milgram conducted experiments to test how far an ordinary person would go to inflict pain onto a stranger. The Nazi killing was brutal and inhumane, but the people conflicting death upon thousands felt no remorse or guilt so the Milgram Experiment was used to finally get answers. Milgram concluded that many will go to extreme lengths to obey authority and tend to believe what they are doingRead MoreStanley Milgram s Psychology Of Obedience1058 Words   |  5 PagesStanley Milgram, established a new course of study in the psychology of obedience. The purpose of his experiment was to have an idea of to see how people react the autocritical standard; during his experiment, he recorded how people will behave when given a source of power. Milgram gained this idea after the World War II. He believed that some people had the ability to essentially block out human thoughts of morals, ethics, and sympathetics when assigned to a job. The core issue that Milgram facedRead MoreAnalyzing Stanley Milgrams The Lost Letter Experiment1538 Words   |  6 PagesThe Lost Letter: Stanley Milgrams experiment Stanley Milgram is one of the most influential of the American postwar social scientists. Milgrams reputation lies not so much in his construction of wide, over-arching theories but in his ability to create provocative, strange even controversial experiments that test conventional notions of moral behavior. Although profoundly different, many of Milgrams experiments possess a common theme that of the situation-specific nature of morality. Humans wereRead MoreAsch s Conformity Experiment And Milgram s Obedience Experiment Essay1586 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction This report will compare two experiments; Asch s conformity experiment and Milgram s obedience experiment. The two experiments will be compared for validity and their ethics. In addition, this report will take into consideration Zimbardo s Stanford Prison experiment and the Lucifer Effect. To analyse how obedience and conformity theories can be used as an example of why good people can turn bad. This report will also look at how obedience and conformity can be applied to the criminalRead MoreAnnotated Bibliography On Obedience And Authority Essay1149 Words   |  5 PagesSeptember 29, 2016] I. Introduction A. Motivation of this research There are little facts about the role of obedience up until now. Psychologists have been debating on factors that constitute obedience within an individual. For example, certain theories suggest that people do horrible actions only if they are ordered to do so. Research has shown that most people obey all orders given to them by the authority-figure. The idea of this topic came to me while flipping through channels. I came acrossRead MoreSocial Identity Theory And Fees Must Fall Protests Essay1257 Words   |  6 PagesSocial Identity Theory and Fees Must Fall Protests 1411588 Phoenix Falconer-Pincus Protests play a highly significant role in generating awareness of a certain topic, grievance or issue that may affect certain demographics or groups of people. The below essay aims to explore the connection between social and collective identity, and its influence and importance in protests. This will be done by discussing the â€Å"FeesMustFall† movement that was aimed at getting free tertiary education in South AfricaRead Morepsy Article: Obey at Any Cost? Essay925 Words   |  4 Pagesthere is a time where we may judge and not agree while others may not pass a judgment and be in agreement. In the study of Psychology we look to a researchers finding to prove the way we respond to emotional, environmental and societal changes. Stanley Milgram a researcher that set out on the behalf of Yale University conducted a study to determine how obedient we become when driven or motivated by authority to inflict mild to severe pain is applied. Milgram’s study creates a huge de bate in ethicsRead MoreMilgram Experiment Essay1532 Words   |  7 PagesBaumrind vs. Milgram debate Milgram’s experiment was an experiment that tested whether people would people would administer shock to another person even though the person receiving the shock would refuse to participate. During the experiment, Milgram would have the subject be the teacher and the other person people the student. While Milgram believed the experiment produced great results, a lady named Diana Baumrind believed the experiment should have not been conducted at all. Baumrind believedRead MoreHistory Of Obedience And Conformity1729 Words   |  7 Pagesthe utterance of â€Å"research in obedience,† Stanley Milgram is the epithet in social psychology. 56 years ago, Milgram tested the limits of a person s ability to commit deeds that would normally be directionally challenging to their moral compass when commanded to act by an authority figure. Just 15 years after the World War II Holocaust, the Milgram experiments was a social psychology response to a topic of â€Å"particular relevanc e† during that time (Milgram, 1963): Were Nazi officers following orders

Statutory Explanation

Question: What happened in lower courts, What happened in plain everyday language and What does this all mean in simple terms? Answer: Procedural History The claimant namely, Aisha Nicolas, appealed to the Michigan Court of Appeals against the order that was passed by the Michigan Compensation Appellate Commission (MCAC) and Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that disqualified the claimant from receiving unemployment benefits (Harvey, 2014). The claimant held that the lower tribunals made a decision as opposed to the law and they failed in identifying that health and physical condition are not in the control of any person and that the conduct of the claimant did not constitute to any kind of disqualification against the interest of the employer (ACS) (Barnard, 2012). Facts Auto Club Services (ACS) as a customer sales representative hired the claimant on October 2012. As per the leave policy of the company, an employee earned three days off from work after working for 90 days (Berman et al., 2015). This was known as the no fault attendance policy. However, no written exceptions to this policy were laid. On February 28, 2013, the claimant felt unwell and she informed ACS about her absenteeism through voice mail. On March 1, 2013, she was discharged for her absenteeism because of the no fault attendance policy. Additionally, she was also disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits as laid in MCL 421.29(1) (b). Plaintiff Argues: That her conduct was not illegal and not subject to disqualification from the employment benefits as physical well being and health is not under the control of an ordinary human being. Defendant Argues: The Claimant failed to comply with the attendance policy of ACS and non compliance with any of the attendance policy of the company shall mean disqualification and discharge of the employee from his existing services irrespective of whether the employee informed the employer about his condition or not (Neubauer Meinhold, 2016). Question to be decided: Based on the facts, the issue that arises in this case here is whether an absence for good cause un violation of an employers attendance policy constitute to misconduct or not? Holding of Court: The Court held that if a person takes leaves from work for a good cause then such action does not constitute to misconduct under MCL 421.29(1) (b). Majority Opinion The plaintiff, Aisha Nicholas, won the case as the Court argued that even though the claimant failed to comply with the attendance policy of the organization yet she informed the organization about her absenteeism. Additionally, the Court also held that physical and health condition is not under the control of There was no dissent to the decision that was decided by the Michigan Court of Appeals Rule of case The Court in this decision held that infractions that lead to termination do not necessarily lead to misconduct under MCL 421.29(1) (b). Absenteeism that is beyond the control of a person does not lead to misconduct. The Court held that the Claimant was wrongfully disqualified for misconduct and demanded for further proceedings in favor of the claimant. Statutory Explanation: Popular Name of the Statute: Michigan Employment Security Act MCL Citation: Michigan Employment Security Act, 1936 PA 1, 421.29 Date when the Statute was passed: 1936 Last Amended Year: 2016 Summary of the Act: The Act deals with those situations in which the employee who has left work, either voluntarily or involuntarily, shall be subject to disqualifications from utilizing employment benefits. The four most important provisions of the statute are summarized as follows: An employee who has left work without sufficient reason may be subject to disqualification. An employee who has left left work with reasonable cause shall not be subject to disqualification. A person who informs the employer prior to taking a leave from the company may not be subject to disqualification An employee who has been away from work due to physical or health condition that is beyond her control shall not be subject to disqualification as per the Act (Player, 2013). References: Barnard, C. (2012). EU employment law. Oxford University Press. Berman, E. M., Bowman, J. S., West, J. P., Van Wart, M. R. (2015). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. Sage Publications. Feng, C., Nelson, L. P., Simon, T. W. (2016). Contract and Employment Law. In Chinas Changing Legal System (pp. 129-140). Palgrave Macmillan US. Harvey, P. (2014). Securing the right to employment: Social welfare policy and the unemployed in the United States. Princeton University Press. Henry, N. (2015). Public administration and public affairs. Routledge. Neubauer, D., Meinhold, S. (2016). Judicial process: law, courts, and politics in the United States. Nelson Education. Player, M. (2013). Federal Law of Employment Discrimination in a Nutshell, 7th. West Academic. Twomey, D. (2012). Labor and Employment Law: Text Cases. Cengage Learning.